Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856743›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Intestinal microbiota composition is altered according to nutritional biorhythms in the leopard coral grouper (Plectropomus leopardus).

Miyuki Mekuchi, Taiga Asakura, Kenji Sakata, Tomofumi Yamaguchi, Kazuhisa Teruya, Jun Kikuchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Seasonal and Regional Dynamics of the Intestinal Microbiota inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Effect of DietaryMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Gut Microbiota and Energy Homeostasis in Fish.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miyuki MekuchiRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Taiga AsakuraRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kenji SakataRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomofumi YamaguchiResearch Center for Subtropical Fisheries, Ishikagi, Japan.
Kazuhisa TeruyaResearch Center for Subtropical Fisheries, Ishikagi, Japan.
Jun KikuchiRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6809-394X
RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aquaculture is currently a major source of fish and has the potential to become a major source of protein in the future. These demands require efficient aquaculture. The intestinal microbiota plays an integral role that benefits the host, providing nutrition and modulating the immune system. Although our understanding of microbiota in fish gut has increased, comprehensive studies examining fish microbiota and host metabolism remain limited. Here, we investigated the microbiota and host metabolism in the coral leopard grouper, which is traded in Asian markets as a superior fish and has begun to be produced via aquaculture. We initially examined the structural changes of the gut microbiota using next-generation sequencing and found that the composition of microbiota changed between fasting and feeding conditions. The dominant phyla were Proteobacteria in fasting and Firmicutes in feeding; interchanging the dominant bacteria required 12 hours. Moreover, microbiota diversity was higher under feeding conditions than under fasting conditions. Multivariate analysis revealed that Proteobacteria are the key bacteria in fasting and Firmicutes and Fusobacteria are the key bacteria in feeding. Subsequently, we estimated microbiota functional capacity. Microbiota functional structure was relatively stable throughout the experiment; however, individual function activity changed according to feeding conditions. Taken together, these findings indicate that the gut microbiota could be a key factor to understanding fish feeding conditions and play a role in interactions with host metabolism. In addition, the composition of microbiota in ambient seawater directly affects the fish; therefore, it is important to monitor the microbiota in rearing tanks and seawater circulating systems.

Indexed as

BacillotaFusobacteriaPeriodicityProteobacteriaAnimalsGastrointestinal MicrobiomePerciformes

Identifiers

PMID29856743
PMCPMC5983564
OpenAlexW2806719123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.