Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856662›Full record

ReviewExpert review of respiratory medicine2018

How close are we to definitively identifying the respiratory health effects of e-cigarettes?

Alexsandra Ratajczak, Wojciech Feleszko, Danielle M Smith, Maciej Goniewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of respiratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Electronic Cigarettes and Asthma: What Do We Know So Far?Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. ACMT Position Statement: Limiting Harms of Vaping and E-cigarette Use.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. E-Cigarette Health Harm Awareness and Discouragement: Implications for Health Communication.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Sensory Evaluation of E-Liquid Flavors by Smelling and Vaping Yields Similar Results.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. White Paper on Electronic Nicotine Delivery System.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Article
  19. A Deliberate Choice? Exploring the Decision to Switch from Cigarettes to E-Cigarettes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexsandra Ratajczaka Department of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases and Allergy , Medical University of Warsaw , Warsaw , Poland.
Wojciech Feleszkoa Department of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases and Allergy , Medical University of Warsaw , Warsaw , Poland.
Danielle M Smithb Department of Health Behavior , Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center , Buffalo , NY , USA.
Maciej Goniewiczb Department of Health Behavior , Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center , Buffalo , NY , USA.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUse of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) is frequently promoted as a less harmful alternative to cigarette smoking. The impact of repeated inhalation of e-cigarette aerosols on respiratory health is not well understood. Areas covered: Using results from laboratory, observational, and clinical studies, we synthesize evidence relevant to potential respiratory health effects that may result from inhalation of e-cigarette aerosols. Expert commentary: Chemical analyses reveal that e-cigarette aerosols contain numerous respiratory irritants and toxicants. There are documented cytotoxic effects of e-cigarette constituents on lung tissue. Studies among ex-smokers who switched to e-cigarettes note reduced exposure to numerous respiratory toxicants, reduced asthma exacerbations, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease symptoms. Regular exposure to e-cigarette aerosols is associated with impaired respiratory functioning. Potential respiratory health risks resulting from secondhand e-cigarette aerosol exposure have not been sufficiently evaluated. Current evidence indicates that although e-cigarettes are not without risk, these products seemingly pose fewer respiratory health harms issues compared to tobacco cigarettes. Data from prospective studies and randomized controlled trials examining the impact of e-cigarette use on lung health are needed to better understand respiratory health risks tied to use of these products.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAerosolsHumansNicotineParticulate MatterRespiratory Tract DiseasesVapingAerosolsNicotineParticulate MatterE-cigaretteselectronic cigarettesvaping

Identifiers

PMID29856662
PMCPMC6310477
OpenAlexW2806480233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.