Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856657›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2018

Hospital Volume of Immunosuppressed Patients with Sepsis and Sepsis Mortality.

Jared A Greenberg, Samuel F Hohmann, Bryan D James, Raj C Shah, Jesse B Hall, John P Kress, Michael Z David

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Update in Critical Care and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome 2018.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jared A Greenberg1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-3446-2903
Samuel F Hohmann3 Department of Health Systems Management.ORCID 0000-0001-9106-1594
Bryan D James4 Department of Internal Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-1932-151X
Raj C Shah5 Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, and.ORCID 0000-0001-9706-9730
Jesse B Hall7 Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
John P Kress7 Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Michael Z David8 Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-1926-7800

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN RESPIRATORY BIOLOGYT32HL007605 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Yun Fang, Gokhan M. Mutlu · 1985 to 2026
$18.1M
Cognitive decline after hospitalization in older adults: predictors and pathogenesisK01AG050823 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI JAMES, BRYAN DAVID · 2015 to 2019
$580k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007605NIA NIH HHS K01 AG050823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleImmunosuppressive medical conditions are risk factors for mortality from severe infections. It is unknown whether hospital characteristics affect this risk.

objectivesTo determine whether the odds of death for an immunosuppressed patient with sepsis relative to a nonimmunosuppressed patient with sepsis varies according to the hospital's yearly case volume of immunosuppressed patients with sepsis.

methodsPatients with sepsis at hospitals in the Vizient database were characterized as immunosuppressed or not immunosuppressed on the basis of diagnosis codes and medication use. Hospitals were grouped into quartiles based on their average volumes of immunosuppressed patients with sepsis per year. Multilevel logistic regression with clustering of patients by hospital was used to determine whether the odds of in-hospital death from sepsis owing to a suppressed immune state varied by hospital quartile.

resultsThere were 350,183 patients with sepsis at 60 hospitals in the Vizient database from 2010 to 2012. Immunosuppressed patients with sepsis at the 15 hospitals in the lowest quartile (64 to 224 immunosuppressed patients with sepsis per year) had an increased odds of in-hospital death relative to nonimmunosuppressed patients with sepsis at these hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.50; P < 0.001). The odds of in-hospital death for immunosuppressed patients with sepsis relative to nonimmunosuppressed patients with sepsis was similar for patients at hospitals in the second, third, and fourth quartiles (225 to 1,056 immunosuppressed patients with sepsis per year). The adjusted odds of death from sepsis owing to a suppressed immune state of 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.25; P < 0.001) for patients at these 45 hospitals was significantly less than for patients at the 15 hospitals in the lowest quartile (P = 0.004 for difference).

conclusionsThe risk of death from sepsis owing to a suppressed immune state was greatest at hospitals with the lowest volume of immunosuppressed patients with sepsis. Further study is needed to determine whether this finding is related to differences in patient characteristics or in care delivery at hospitals with different amounts of exposure to immunosuppressed patients.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityImmunocompromised HostAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCritical CareFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, High-VolumeHospitals, Low-VolumeHumansLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle Agedimmunosuppressedmultiple organ failureoutcomes of intensive care unit managementsepsis

Identifiers

PMID29856657
PMCPMC6322036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.