Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29856502›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2018

Application of three different methods to determine the prevalence, the abundance and the environmental drivers of culturable Vibrio cholerae in fresh and brackish bathing waters.

A K T Kirschner, S Pleininger, S Jakwerth, S Rehak, A H Farnleitner, S Huhulescu, A Indra

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A K T KirschnerInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Water Hygiene, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-3073
S PleiningerInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
S JakwerthInstitute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Water Hygiene, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
S RehakInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
A H FarnleitnerInteruniversity Cooperation Centre for Water & Health, Vienna, Austria.
S HuhulescuInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
A IndraInstitute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, Vienna, Austria.
Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety · ATInteruniversity Cooperation Centre Water & Health · ATTU Wien · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P21625-B20Austrian Science Fund FWF P 21625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThree cultivation methods were used to study the prevalence and abundance of Vibrio cholerae in Eastern Austrian bathing waters and to elucidate the main factors controlling their distribution. METHODS AND

resultsVibrio cholerae abundance was monitored at 36 inland bathing sites with membrane filtration (MF), a standard most probable number (MPN) approach and direct plating (DP). Membrane filtration yielded the most reliable and sensitive results and allowed V. cholerae detection at 22 sites with concentrations up to 39 000 CFU per 100 ml, all belonging to serogroups other than O1 and O139 and not coding for cholera toxin and toxin coregulated pilus. Direct plating turned out as an easy method for environments with high V. cholerae abundances, conductivity was the only significant predictor of V. cholerae abundance in the bathing waters at warm water temperatures.

conclusionsVibrio cholerae nonO1/nonO139 are widely prevalent in Eastern Austrian bathing waters. Instead of the standard MPN approach, MF and DP are recommended for V. cholerae monitoring. Conductivity can be used as a first easy-to-measure parameter to identify potential bathing waters at risk. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Vibrio cholerae nonO1/nonO139 infections associated with bathing activities are an increasing public health issue in many countries of the northern hemisphere. However, there are only limited data available on the prevalence and abundance of V. cholerae in coastal and inland bathing waters. For monitoring V. cholerae prevalence and abundance, reliable and simple quantification methods are needed. Moreover, prediction of V. cholerae abundance from environmental parameters would be a helpful tool for risk assessment. This study identified the best culture-based quantification methods and a first quick surrogate parameter to attain these aims.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBathsFiltrationFresh WaterPrevalenceVibrio choleraeWater Microbiologyconductivitycultivationdirect platinginfectionmembrane filtrationmost probable numberVibrio cholerae nonO1/nonO139

Identifiers

PMID29856502
PMCPMC6175421
OpenAlexW2805955363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.