Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29855976›Full record

ArticleThe patient2018

Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) Questionnaire to Understand Veterans' Preferences for Tobacco Treatment in Primary Care.

David A Katz, Kenda R Stewart, Monica Paez, Mark W Vander Weg, Kathleen M Grant, Christine Hamlin, Gary Gaeth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David A KatzComprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System (152), Iowa City, IA, 52246-2208, USA. david-katz@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-6532
Kenda R StewartComprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System (152), Iowa City, IA, 52246-2208, USA.
Monica PaezComprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System (152), Iowa City, IA, 52246-2208, USA.
Mark W Vander WegComprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System (152), Iowa City, IA, 52246-2208, USA.
Kathleen M GrantVA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA.
Christine HamlinComprehensive Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE) Center, Iowa City VA Health Care System (152), Iowa City, IA, 52246-2208, USA.
Gary GaethTippie School of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
HSRD VA PPO 15-429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviders often prescribe counseling and/or medications for tobacco cessation without considering patients' treatment preferences.

objectiveThe primary aims of this study are to describe (1) the development of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire designed to identify the attributes and levels of tobacco treatment that are most important to veterans; and (2) the decision-making process in choosing between hypothetical tobacco treatments.

methodsWe recruited current smokers who were already scheduled for a primary care appointment within a single Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. Subjects were asked to rate the importance of selected treatment attributes and were interviewed during two rounds of pilot testing of initial DCE instruments. Key attributes and levels of the initial instruments were identified by targeted literature review; the instruments were iteratively revised after each round of pilot testing. Using a 'think aloud' approach, subjects were interviewed while completing DCE choice tasks. Constant comparison techniques were used to characterize the issues raised by subjects. Findings from the cognitive interviews were used to revise the initial DCE instruments.

resultsMost subjects completed the DCE questionnaire without difficulty and considered two or more attributes in choosing between treatments. Two common patterns of decision-making emerged during the cognitive interviews: (1) counting 'pros' and 'cons' of each treatment alternative; and (2) using a 'rule-out' strategy to eliminate a given treatment choice if it included an undesirable attribute. Subjects routinely discounted the importance of certain attributes and, in a few cases, focused primarily on a single 'must-have' attribute.

conclusionCognitive interviews provide valuable insights into the comprehension and interpretation of DCE attributes, the decision processes used by veterans during completion of choice tasks, and underlying reasons for non'-compensatory decision-making.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultAgedComprehensionCounselingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient PreferencePrimary Health CareSmoking CessationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesUnited StatesVeterans

Identifiers

PMID29855976
PMCPMC6697115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.