Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29855772›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Febrile neutropenia in adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a retrospective study in routine clinical practice from a single institution.

Joy Bacrie, Marc Laurans, Pauline Iorio, Emmanuelle Fourme, Anne Béthune Volters, Laurence Bozec, Florence Lerebours, Coraline Dubot, Okba Bensaoula, Bilel Benzidane and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Real-world evaluation of supportive care using an electronic health record text-mining tool: G-CSF use in breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joy BacrieInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France. Joy.bacrie@curie.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8759-1274
Marc LauransInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Pauline IorioInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Emmanuelle FourmeInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Anne Béthune VoltersInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Laurence BozecInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Florence LereboursInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Coraline DubotInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Okba BensaoulaInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Bilel BenzidaneInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Jean-Yves PiergaInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Delphine LefeuvreInstitut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France.
Hôpital René Huguenin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFebrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the most common and most critical adverse effects of chemotherapy. Despite many existing guidelines based on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), FN continues to impair the quality of life and interfere with the treatment of many patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and management of FN associated with chemotherapy for early breast cancer in routine clinical practice.

methodsAll patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) treated by chemotherapy at Institut Curie, Hôpital René Huguenin, in 2014 were retrospectively included. The incidence and management of FN were reported. Risk factors associated with FN were studied by robust-error-variance Poisson regression.

resultsA total of 524 patients received either neoadjuvant (N = 130) or adjuvant chemotherapy (N = 394). Most patients (80%) were treated with a combination of 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC100; 3 cycles) followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m

conclusionThe incidence of FN induced by adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ESBC is higher in routine clinical practice than in clinical trials. AI or inflammatory diseases were significant independent risk factors for FN. Primary prophylaxis in patients at risk (elderly, comorbid patients), especially treated with the FEC regimen, is the keystone of management of this adverse effect. Prevention and management of FN to ensure the patient's safety and quality of life are a major issue for both medical oncologists and supportive care physicians.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyOutpatientsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEarly-stage breast cancerFNOutpatientRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID29855772
OpenAlexW2807063093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.