ArticleScientific reports2018
Quantitative analysis of the effect of environmental-scanning electron microscopy on collagenous tissues.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Environmental-scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) is routinely applied to various biological samples due to its ability to maintain a wet environment while imaging; moreover, the technique obviates the need for sample coating. However, there is limited research carried out on electron-beam (e-beam) induced tissue damage resulting from using the ESEM. In this paper, we use quantitative second-harmonic generation (SHG) microscopy to examine the effects of e-beam exposure from the ESEM on collagenous tissue samples prepared as either fixed, frozen, wet or dehydrated. Quantitative SHG analysis of tissues, before and after ESEM e-beam exposure in low-vacuum mode, reveals evidence of cross-linking of collagen fibers, however there are no structural differences observed in fixed tissue. Meanwhile wet-mode ESEM appears to radically alter the structure from a regular fibrous arrangement to a more random fiber orientation. We also confirm that ESEM images of collagenous tissues show higher spatial resolution compared to SHG microscopy, but the relative tradeoff with collagen specificity reduces its effectiveness in quantifying collagen fiber organization. Our work provides insight on both the limitations of the ESEM for tissue imaging, and the potential opportunity to use as a complementary technique when imaging fine features in the non-collagenous regions of tissue samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.