Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29855389›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2018

Comorbidity in gout at the time of first diagnosis: sex differences that may have implications for dosing of urate lowering therapy.

Panagiota Drivelegka, Valgerdur Sigurdardottir, Anna Svärd, Lennart T H Jacobsson, Mats Dehlin

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Colchicine-Phoenix from the ashes].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Evolving Landscape of Gout in the Female: A Narrative Review.Gout, urate, and crystal deposition disease · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A glance into the future of gout.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Panagiota DrivelegkaDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Grona Straket 12, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden. panagiota.drivelegka@vgregion.se.
Valgerdur SigurdardottirDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Grona Straket 12, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna SvärdCentre of Clinical Research Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Lennart T H JacobssonDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Grona Straket 12, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Mats DehlinDepartment of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Grona Straket 12, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SECenter for Clinical Research Dalarna · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to examine the occurrence of comorbidities at the time of first diagnosis of gout compared with matched population controls, overall and by sex, as well as to examine the crude and age-standardized prevalence of these comorbidities in men and women with gout at first diagnosis.

methodsA population-based study used data from Swedish national and regional registers, including 14,113 gout patients aged ≥ 20 years, with a first recorded diagnosis of gout between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2012, and 65,782 population controls, matched by age, sex and county. Prevalence ratios (95% confidence intervals) comparing gout cases and controls were calculated, overall and by sex. Crude and age-standardized prevalence (95% confidence interval) of all comorbidities in gout patients were calculated, to show differences between sexes, taking also the higher age at diagnosis in women into account.

resultsAll examined comorbidities were 1.2-2.5-fold more common in gout patients at diagnosis than in population controls in both sexes. Women with gout were on average 6 years older than men at first gout diagnosis and most comorbidities, including obesity and diuretic use, were or tended to be more frequent in women than in men. When standardizing for age, women had a higher prevalence of thromboembolism (6.6% vs 5.2%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.1% vs 2.4%). Men, on the other hand, had a higher prevalence of coronary heart disease (9.4% vs 6.4%), atrial fibrillation (9.0% vs 6.0%), congestive heart failure (7.7% vs 6.6%) and stroke (4.1% vs 3.3%).

conclusionsThe occurrence of most comorbidities was significantly increased at first diagnosis of gout in both sexes. Women were older at diagnosis and had higher occurrence of most comorbidities, including obesity and diuretic use, factors that increase serum urate, and this needs to be taken into account when starting and optimizing urate lowering therapy. These sex differences were attenuated when standardizing for age and the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases was actually higher in men.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesComorbidityDose-Response Relationship, DrugEarly DiagnosisFemaleGoutGout SuppressantsHeart DiseasesHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedObesityGout SuppressantsUric AcidComorbidityEpidemiologyGenderGoutUrate lowering treatment

Identifiers

PMID29855389
PMCPMC5984404
OpenAlexW2805328584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.