Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29855270›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Regional variations in childbirth interventions in the Netherlands: a nationwide explorative study.

A E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, D C Zondag, M Nieuwenhuijze, T Van den Akker, C J Verhoeven, C Geerts, F Schellevis, A De Jonge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A E Seijmonsbergen-SchermersDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. a.seijmonsbergen@vumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-2205
D C ZondagDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M NieuwenhuijzeResearch Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
T Van den AkkerDepartment of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
C J VerhoevenDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C GeertsDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
F SchellevisNIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
A De JongeDepartment of Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough interventions in childbirth are important in order to prevent neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality, non-indicated use may cause avoidable harm. Regional variations in intervention rates, which cannot be explained by maternal characteristics, may indicate over- and underuse. The aim of this study is to explore regional variations in childbirth interventions in the Netherlands and their associations with interventions and adverse outcomes, controlled for maternal characteristics.

methodsChildbirth intervention rates were compared between twelve Dutch regions, using data from the national perinatal birth register for 2010-2013. All single childbirths from 37 weeks' gestation onwards were included. Primary outcomes were induction and augmentation of labour, pain medication, instrumental birth, caesarean section (prelabour, intrapartum) and paediatric involvement. Secondary outcomes were adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for maternal characteristics. Associations were expressed in Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

resultsMost variation was found for type of pain medication and paediatric involvement. Epidural analgesia rates varied from between 12 and 38% (nulliparous) and from between 5 and 14% (multiparous women). These rates were negatively correlated with rates of other pharmacological pain relief, which varied from between 15 and 43% (nulliparous) and from between 10 and 27% (multiparous). Rates of paediatric involvement varied from between 37 and 60% (nulliparous) and from between 26 and 43% (multiparous). For instrumental vaginal births, rates varied from between 16 and 19% (nulliparous) and from between 3 and 4% (multiparous). For intrapartum caesarean section, the variation was 13-15% and 5-6%, respectively. A positive correlation was found between intervention rates in midwife-led and obstetrician-led care at the onset of labour within the same region. Adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes were not lower in regions with higher intervention rates. Higher augmentation of labour rates correlated with higher rates of severe postpartum haemorrhage.

conclusionsMost variation was found for type of pain medication and paediatric involvement, and least for instrumental vaginal births and intrapartum caesarean sections. Care providers and policy makers should critically audit remarkable variations, since these may be unwarranted. Limited variation for some interventions may indicate consensus for their use. Further research should focus on variations in evidence-based interventions and indications for the use of interventions in childbirth.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesia, ObstetricalCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleGeographyHumansLabor, InducedLogistic ModelsMaternal Health ServicesMultivariate AnalysisNetherlandsPediatricsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRegistriesCaesarean sectionChildbirthInductionInterventionsObstetricOutcomesPain reliefRegionalVariations

Identifiers

PMID29855270
PMCPMC5984340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.