Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854801›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2018

Performance of Two Screening Questionnaires for Inflammatory Arthritis in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Rubén Queiro, Sergio Rodríguez-Caminero, Sabino Riestra, Ruth de Francisco, Isabel Pérez-Martínez, Javier Ballina

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rubén QueiroRheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8418-7145
Sergio Rodríguez-CamineroRheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
Sabino RiestraGastroenterology Division, IBD Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
Ruth de FranciscoGastroenterology Division, IBD Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
Isabel Pérez-MartínezGastroenterology Division, IBD Unit, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2535-1929
Javier BallinaRheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal symptoms are the most common extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). An essential step in the management of these patients is to establish referral algorithms through the use of appropriate screening tools. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of two simple questionnaires to detect inflammatory arthritis (IA) in patients with IBD. Two questionnaires, one for detecting axial IA and the other for peripheral IA, were tested among 112 IBD unselected consecutive patients of both sexes, aged 18-45 years. The study period was from January to December 2016. Each questionnaire was composed of three simple questions. If the patient answered affirmatively at least to two of the three questions, the questionnaire was considered positive. Clinical diagnosis of IA based on an expert's opinion was the reference gold standard. To obtain a weighted value of sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratio (LR) values were calculated. Twenty-seven percent of the patients were considered positive responders to the axial questionnaire while 32% were considered positive responders to the peripheral questionnaire. Twenty-four patients (21.4%) were diagnosed with axial IA, whereas 26% had peripheral IA. The axial questionnaire yielded a sensitivity of 87.5% (67.6-97.3), specificity of 89.8% (81.5-92.2) and LR+ of 8.6 (4.5-16.2). For the peripheral questionnaire, these values were 82.8% (64.2-94.2), 87.4% (79-93.3), and 6.6 (3.8-11.4), respectively. Both questionnaires showed an adequate screening capacity for IA in patients with IBD. Their specificity, together with their simplicity, can make them suitable detection tools in gastroenterology and general medicine consultations.

Indexed as

AdultArthritisFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29854801
PMCPMC5964541
OpenAlexW2802385843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.