Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854767›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Futile Recanalization after Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Ximing Nie, Yuehua Pu, Zhe Zhang, Xin Liu, Wanying Duan, Liping Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ximing NieDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8380-4076
Yuehua PuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhe ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xin LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wanying DuanDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liping LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2943-055X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early recanalization after endovascular treatment could improve the prognosis of acute ischemia stroke. Futile recanalization often occurred which was one of the main causes of failure. By now the mechanisms of futile recanalization were not clear. They are probably concerned with bad collateral circulation, subacute reocclusion, large hypoperfusion volumes, microvascular compromise, and impaired cerebral autoregulation. Previous research found that some of the image markers could be used as the accurate predictors for poor prognosis after successful treatment in order to identify the patients who were not suitable for recanalization and reduce some of the unnecessary cost. Predictors for futile recanalization mentioned in our article can be used for supplement to make decision for endovascular treatment.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaCerebrovascular CirculationEndovascular ProceduresHomeostasisHumansStroke

Identifiers

PMID29854767
PMCPMC5966674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.