ArticleEmergency medicine international2018
A Retrospective 10-Year Analysis of Water Absorbent Bead Ingestion in Children.
Article in Emergency medicine international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pediatric Water Bead Ingestion: Experience from a Quaternary Care Children's Hospital and a Proposed Management Algorithm.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- Acute Small Bowel Obstruction Secondary to Hygroscopic Water Beads Ingestion: A Report of Two Pediatric Cases.Cureus · 2026Article
- Retained crystal ball in pediatric gastrointestinal tract: a cautionary case report.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Water beads: Expanding toy and 'new' problem for paediatric surgeons and community.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Review
- Water beads ingestion presenting with repeated bowel obstruction in an infant.BMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Management of Gastrointestinal Foreign Bodies with Brief Review of the Guidelines.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2023Review
- An Unusual Case of Small Bowel Obstruction.Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Multidisciplinary Management for Intestinal Obstruction by Gel Ball Ingestion.Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis retrospective case series was designed to evaluate the clinical experience of pediatric patients who had ingested water absorbent beads (WABs) and review the relevant literature. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective chart analysis of 21 children who were admitted to the emergency service or outpatient clinic with complaints of swallowing WABs during a 10-year period was performed. The patients were divided into two groups: 6 patients who were hospitalized and 15 patients who were observed as outpatients for groups 1 and 2, respectively. All data were screened with respect to presentation, age, gender, clinical and radiological findings, modalities of treatment, and follow-up.
resultsAll patients were asymptomatic with uneventful outcomes. Laboratory studies, X-ray, and ultrasound examinations revealed normal results. None of the patients underwent surgery or other medical procedures. Gastrointestinal system obstruction or any other pathological findings were not detected after WAB ingestion. No complications were identified during follow-up. DISCUSSION: This first clinical study showed that asymptomatic patients do not require inpatient observation and laboratory investigations, X-ray, and ultrasound. However, results of the present study cannot be generalized to children of all ages due to the few cases of bowel obstruction reported to date in small children.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.