Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854408›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2018

Validation of two short questionnaires assessing physical activity in colorectal cancer patients.

Hege Berg Henriksen, Sveinung Berntsen, Ingvild Paur, Manuela Zucknick, Anne Juul Skjetne, Siv Kjølsrud Bøhn, Christine Henriksen, Sigbjørn Smeland, Monica Hauger Carlsen, Rune Blomhoff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01570010 (The Norwegian Dietary Guidelines and Colorectal Cancer Survival Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01570010 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Norwegian Dietary Guidelines and Colorectal Cancer Survival Study: A Food-based Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2012 to 2040Enrolled503ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsNorwegian food based dietary guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reallocating sedentary time to physical activity: effects on fatigue and quality of life in patients with breast cancer in the Phys-Can project.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hege Berg Henriksen1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sveinung Berntsen2Faculty of Health and Sports Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Ingvild Paur1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Manuela Zucknick4Department of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Juul Skjetne1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Siv Kjølsrud Bøhn1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christine Henriksen1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sigbjørn Smeland5Department for Clinical Service, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Monica Hauger Carlsen1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rune Blomhoff1Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-3615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to investigate the impact of adherence to recommendations of physical activity and sedentary time on health outcomes in clinical trials, there is a need for feasible tools such as questionnaires that can give representative estimates of these measures. The primary aim of the present study was to validate two such questionnaires and their ability to estimate adherence to the recommendations of physical activity defined as moderate-to- vigorous physical activity or moderate physical activity of at least 150 min/week in colorectal cancer patients. Secondarily, self-reported sedentary time from the HUNT-PAQ was also evaluated.

methodsParticipants from 'The Norwegian dietary guidelines and colorectal cancer survival-study' (CRC-NORDIET study) completed two short questionnaires; the NORDIET-FFQ (

resultsThe NORDIET-FFQ provided better estimates of time in moderate-to- vigorous physical activity and moderate physical activity than the HUNT-PAQ. The NORDIET-FFQ was unable to rank individual time in moderate-to- vigorous physical activity and moderate physical activity (Spearman's rho = 0.08,

conclusionsThe NORDIET-FFQ provided better specificity and better estimates of PA than the HUNT-PAQ. The HUNT-PAQ provided better sensitivity, and provided better ranking of PA and sedentary time among women than NORDIET-FFQ. It is important to be aware of the limitations documented in the present study.

trial registrationThe study is registered on the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials (Identifier: NCT01570010). Registered 4 April 2012.

Indexed as

Physical activityPhysical activity recommendationsSedentary timeSenseWear armband miniShort questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID29854408
PMCPMC5975662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.