Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854313›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Simultaneous identification of clinically relevant single nucleotide variants, copy number alterations and gene fusions in solid tumors by targeted next-generation sequencing.

Duarte Mendes Oliveira, Teresa Mirante, Chiara Mignogna, Marianna Scrima, Simona Migliozzi, Gaetano Rocco, Renato Franco, Francesco Corcione, Giuseppe Viglietto, Donatella Malanga and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Duarte Mendes OliveiraDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Teresa MiranteDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Chiara MignognaDepartment of Health Sciences, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Marianna ScrimaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Simona MigliozziDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Gaetano RoccoPathology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Renato FrancoPathology Unit, Second University of Naples, Italy.
Francesco CorcioneUOC Chirurgia Generale, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, Napoli, Italy.
Giuseppe VigliettoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Donatella MalangaDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Antonia RizzutoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Magna Graecia University · ITBiogem · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we have set-up a routine pipeline to evaluate the clinical application of Oncomine™ Focus Assay, a panel that allows the simultaneous detection of single nucleotide hotspot mutations in 35 genes, copy number alterations (CNAs) in 19 genes and gene fusions involving 23 genes in cancer samples. For this study we retrospectively selected 106 patients that were submitted to surgical resection for lung, gastric, colon or rectal cancer. We found that 56 patients out of 106 showed at least one alteration (53%), with 47 patients carrying at least one relevant nucleotide variant, 10 patients carrying at least one CNA and 3 patients carrying one gene fusion. On the basis of the mutational profiles obtained, we have identified 22 patients (20.7%) that were potentially eligible for targeted therapy. The most frequently mutated genes across all tumor types included KRAS (30 patients), PIK3CA (16 patients), BRAF (6 patients), EGFR (5 patients), NRAS (4 patients) and ERBB2 (3 patients) whereas CCND1, ERBB2, EGFR and MYC were the genes most frequently subjected to copy number gain. Finally, gene fusions were identified only in lung cancer patients and involved MET [MET(13)-MET(15) fusion] and FGFR3 [FGFR3(chr 17)-TACC3(chr 11)]. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the analysis with a multi-biomarker panel of cancer patients after surgery, may present several potential advantages in clinical daily practice, including the simultaneous detection of different potentially druggable alterations, reasonable costs, short time of testing and automated interpretation of results.

Indexed as

copy number variationgene fusionsoncomine focus assaysolid tumors

Identifiers

PMID29854313
PMCPMC5978263
OpenAlexW2801591523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.