ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017
Initial Usability Evaluation of a Knowledge-Based Population Health Information System: The Population Health Record (PopHR).
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timelygpt: extrapolatable transformer pre-training for long-term time-series forecasting in healthcare.Health information science and systems · 2025Article
- Human factors methods in the design of digital decision support systems for population health: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Modeling electronic health record data using an end-to-end knowledge-graph-informed topic model.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Human factors applications in the design of decision support systems for population health: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the baseline usability of a novel web-based application, the Population Health Record (PopHR), designed to facilitate the effective use of population health information by public health professionals and to support evidence-based decision-making. The usability test was conducted with ten potential users who each completed eight tasks using the PopHR system. Participant responses were recorded, including timestamps for each data entry. Overall, the task completion rate was 96% while the success rate was 88%. The average time-on-task was 3.11 minutes, with more time spent on tasks requiring a user to stratify data along multiple dimensions, such as age, sex, or geographical region. Usability scores indicated that the current version of PopHR has good usability. Potential improvements identified included adding supporting information, offering different visualizations, and enhancing system stability. These findings are examples of addressable usability problems encountered in developing a population health record system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29854259PMC5977587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.