Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854243›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

Drug repositioning for prostate cancer: using a data-driven approach to gain new insights.

QuanQiu Wang, Rong Xu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Validation approaches for computational drug repurposing: a review.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Review
  3. Disease comorbidity-guided drug repositioning: a case study in schizophrenia.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

QuanQiu WangThinTek, LLC, Palo Alto, CA 94306.
Rong XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland OH 44106.
Case Western Reserve University · USPalo Alto Institute · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024989 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, PAMELA B · 2007 to 2011
$53.7M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR000439 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KONSTAN, MICHAEL W. · 2012 to 2016
$50.0M
Rapid reverse translational drug repositioningDP2HD084068 · NICHD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI XU, RONG · 2014 to 2014
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000439NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024989NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD084068
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. Despite its high incidence and mortality, the likelihood of a cure is low for late-stages of PC. There is an unmet need for more effective agents for treating PC. Here, we present a drug repositioning system, GenoPredict, for finding innovative drug candidates for treating PC. GenoPredict leverages upon a large amount of disease genomics data and a large-scale drug treatment knowledge base (TreatKB) that we recently constructed. We first constructed a genetic disease network (GDN) that comprised of 882 nodes and 200,758 edges and applied a network-based ranking algorithm to find diseases from GDN that are genetically related to PC. We developed a drug prioritization algorithm to reposition drugs from PC-related diseases to treat PC. When evaluated in a de-novo prediction setting using 27 FDA- approved PC drugs, GenoPredict found 25 of 27 FDA-approved PC drugs and ranked them highly (recall: 0.925, mean ranking: 27.3%, median ranking: 15.6%). When compared to PREDICT, a comprehensive drug repositioning system, in novel predictions, GenoPredict performed better than PREDICT across two evaluation datasets. GenoPredict achieved a mean average precision (MAP) of 0.447 when evaluated with 172 PC drugs extracted from 172,888 clinical trial reports, representing a 164.5% improvement as compared to a MAP of 0.169 for PREDICT. When evaluated with 72 PC drugs extracted from 43,811 ongoing clinical trial reports, GenoPredict achieved a MAP of 0.278, representing a 231.1% improvement as compared to a MAP of 0.084 for PREDICT. The data is publicly available at: http://nlp. CASE: edu/public/data/PC_GenoPredict and http: //nlp. CASE: edu/public/data/treatKB.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticDrug RepositioningKnowledge BasesAlgorithmsGenomicsHumansMaleProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29854243
PMCPMC5977574
OpenAlexW2787730121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.