Observational studyAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017
Current State of Electronic Consent Processes in Behavioral Health: Outcomes from an Observational Study.
Observational study in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- State of the art and a mixed-method personalized approach to assess patient perceptions on medical record sharing and sensitivity.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Pooled it
- Incorporating technology in research with older bereaved adults: Lessons learned from conducting an internet-based randomized controlled trial.Internet interventions · 2023Article
- Behavioral Health Professionals' Perceptions on Patient-Controlled Granular Information Sharing (Part 1): Focus Group Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- METORY: Development of a Demand-Driven Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Platform Tailored for Clinical Trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Virtual conversational agents versus online forms: Patient experience and preferences for health data collection.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: the case in CARPEM consortium.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Review
- Key components and IT assistance of participant management in clinical research: a scoping review.JAMIA open · 2020Article
- Mental health professional perspectives on health data sharing: Mixed methods study.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- Mental health professionals' perceptions on patients control of data sharing.Health informatics journal · 2020Article
- GRANULAR PATIENT CONTROL OF PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION: FEDERAL AND STATE LAW CONSIDERATIONS.Jurimetrics · 2018Article
- Physicians differ in their perceptions of sensitive medical records: Survey and interview study.Health informatics journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
An integral element of value-based care is care team access to both physical and behavioral health data. Data release processes in both environments are governed by federal and state statutes. The requirements for obtaining consent are complex and often confusing. Little is known about the consent processes and practices in the behavioral health setting, specifically how patients and surrogates engage in the process and their interactions with electronic consent tools. This study analyzes the consent processes from the patient perspective at two community behavioral health clinics. Outcomes include description of the processes using electronic consent, workflows and consenter-provider interactions. Conclusions include need to streamline and standardize consent technologies and improve consenter engagement. This study supports the development of an electronic consent tool, My Data Choices (MDC), funded by the National Institute of Mental Health, that offers individuals with behavioral health conditions more control over their medical records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29854231PMC5977724W2785848184What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.