Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854217›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

A Semantic Parsing Method for Mapping Clinical Questions to Logical Forms.

Kirk Roberts, Braja Gopal Patra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. quEHRy: a question answering system to query electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  3. Toward a Neural Semantic Parsing System for EHR Question Answering.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Paraphrasing to improve the performance of Electronic Health Records Question Answering.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kirk RobertsSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Braja Gopal PatraSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a method for converting natural language questions about structured data in the electronic health record (EHR) into logical forms. The logical forms can then subsequently be converted to EHR-dependent structured queries. The natural language processing task, known as semantic parsing, has the potential to convert questions to logical forms with extremely high precision, resulting in a system that is usable and trusted by clinicians for real-time use in clinical settings. We propose a hybrid semantic parsing method, combining rule-based methods with a machine learning-based classifier. The overall semantic parsing precision on a set of 212 questions is 95.6%. The parser's rules furthermore allow it to "know what it does not know", enabling the system to indicate when unknown terms prevent it from understanding the question's full logical structure. When combined with a module for converting a logical form into an EHR-dependent query, this high-precision approach allows for a question answering system to provide a user with a single, verifiably correct answer.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsNatural Language ProcessingSemanticsHumansInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

PMID29854217
PMCPMC5977685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.