Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854216›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

Understanding Patient Questions about their Medical Records in an Online Health Forum: Opportunity for Patient Portal Design.

Tera L Reynolds, Nida Ali, Emma McGregor, Trish O'Brien, Christopher Longhurst, Andrew L Rosenberg, Scott E Rudkin, Kai Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Use and impact of an online community for hospital patients.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the Design of an Inpatient Peer Support Tool: Views of Adult Patients.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tera L ReynoldsUniversity of California, Irvine, CA.
Nida AliUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Emma McGregorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Trish O'BrienUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Christopher LonghurstUniversity of California San Diego Health System, San Diego, CA.
Andrew L RosenbergUniversity of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Scott E RudkinUniversity of California Irvine Health, Irvine, CA.
Kai ZhengUniversity of California, Irvine, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many benefits of online patient access to their medical records through technologies such as patient portals. However, patients often have difficulties understanding the clinical data presented in portals. In response, increasingly, patients go online to make sense of this data. One commonly used online resource is health forums. In this pilot study, we focus on one type of clinical data, laboratory results, and one popular forum, MedHelp. We examined patient question posts that contain laboratory results to gain insights into the nature of these questions and of the answers. Our analyses revealed a typology of confusion (i.e., topics of their questions) and potential gaps in traditional healthcare supports (i.e., patients' requests and situational factors), as well as the supports patients may gain through the forum (i.e., what the community provides). These results offer preliminary evidence of opportunities to redesign patient portals, and will inform our future work.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth LiteracyPatient PortalsClinical Laboratory TechniquesConsumer Health InformationHumansInternetPilot ProjectsSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID29854216
PMCPMC5977702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.