ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017
Stakeholder Use and Feedback on Vaccination History and Clinical Decision Support for Immunizations Offered by Public Health.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human factors methods in the design of digital decision support systems for population health: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Development and implementation of an interoperability tool across state public health agency's disease surveillance and immunization information systems.JAMIA open · 2023Article
- Electronic case reporting (eCR) of COVID-19 to public health: implementation perspectives from the Minnesota Department of Health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National initiatives on Electronic Health Records (EHRs) recognize the vital role of public health and recommend reporting to Immunization Information Systems (IIS) and access of its clinical decision support for immunizations (CDSi). The objective of this study was to collect stakeholder feedback on access and utilization of CDSi from the Minnesota Immunization Information Connection (MIIC), Minnesota's IIS. Input was solicited using a semi-structured questionnaire developed by experts, and from a sample of 17 key informants from February 2015 through May 2016. Analysis highlighted the appreciation of MIIC services, comprehensive vaccination history across providers and CDSi functionality, with public health users relying on MIIC. It also identified issues such as data entry due to read-only view, data quality and communications for improvement. These findings underscore the critical role of IIS, need to engage stakeholders, ensure CDSi updates, maintain good data quality, and promote bi-directional data exchanges across EHRs-IIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29854214PMC5977639What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.