Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854156›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

Classifying Acute Ischemic Stroke Onset Time using Deep Imaging Features.

King Chung Ho, William Speier, Suzie El-Saden, Corey W Arnold

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [Progress in computer-assisted Alberta stroke program early computer tomography score of acute ischemic stroke based on different modal images].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Intra-domain task-adaptive transfer learning to determine acute ischemic stroke onset time.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

King Chung HoDepartment of Bioengineering; University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
William SpeierMedical Imaging Informatics; University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Suzie El-SadenMedical Imaging Informatics; University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Corey W ArnoldDepartment of Bioengineering; University of California, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

An Observational Acute Stroke Model for Decision Support and Comparing OutcomesR01NS076534 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BUI, ALEX, DUCKWILER, GARY ROSS · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS076534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models have been developed to predict stroke outcomes (e.g., mortality) in attempt to provide better guidance for stroke treatment. However, there is little work in developing classification models for the problem of unknown time-since-stroke (TSS), which determines a patient's treatment eligibility based on a clinical defined cutoff time point (i.e., <4.5hrs). In this paper, we construct and compare machine learning methods to classify TSS<4.5hrs using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging features. We also propose a deep learning model to extract hidden representations from the MR perfusion-weighted images and demonstrate classification improvement by incorporating these additional imaging features. Finally, we discuss a strategy to visualize the learned features from the proposed deep learning model. The cross-validation results show that our best classifier achieved an area under the curve of 0.68, which improves significantly over current clinical methods (0.58), demonstrating the potential benefit of using advanced machine learning methods in TSS classification.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedArea Under CurveBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRegression AnalysisROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID29854156
PMCPMC5977679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.