Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854148›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

Understanding the Patterns of Health Information Dissemination on Social Media during the Zika Outbreak.

Xinning Gui, Yue Wang, Yubo Kou, Tera Leigh Reynolds, Yunan Chen, Qiaozhu Mei, Kai Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Why do people oppose mask wearing? A comprehensive analysis of U.S. tweets during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinning GuiUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Yue WangUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Yubo KouPurdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Tera Leigh ReynoldsUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Yunan ChenUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Qiaozhu MeiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Kai ZhengUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social media are important platforms for risk communication during public health crises. Effective dissemination of accurate, relevant, and up-to-date health information is important for the public to raise awareness and develop risk management strategies. This study investigates Zika virus-related information circulated on Twitter, identifying the patterns of dissemination of popular tweets and tweets from public health authorities such as the CDC. We leveraged a large corpus of Twitter data covering the entire year of 2016. We analyzed the data using quantitative and qualitative content analyses, followed by machine learning to scale the manual content analyses to the corpus. The results revealed possible discrepancies between what the general public was most interested in, or concerned about, and what public health authorities provided during the Zika outbreak. We provide implications for public health authorities to improve risk communication through better alignment with the general public's information needs during public health crises.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInformation DisseminationMachine LearningPublic Health PracticeSocial MediaZika Virus InfectionCommunicationConsumer Health InformationHumansRiskZika Virus

Identifiers

PMID29854148
PMCPMC5977662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.