ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017
Inferring Clinical Correlations from EEG Reports with Deep Neural Learning.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural language processing in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry: A review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Deep learning in clinical natural language processing: a methodical review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Review
- Active deep learning for the identification of concepts and relations in electroencephalography reports.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Successful diagnosis and management of neurological dysfunction relies on proper communication between the neurologist and the primary physician (or other specialists). Because this communication is documented within medical records, the ability to automatically infer the clinical correlations for a patient from his or her medical records would provide an important step towards enabling health care systems to automatically identify patients requiring additional follow-up as well as flagging any unexpected clinical correlations for review. In this paper, we present a Deep Section Recovery Model (DSRM) which applies deep neural learning on a large body of EEG reports in order to infer the expected clinical correlations for a patient from the information in a given EEG report by (1) automatically extracting word- and report- level features from the report and (2) inferring the most likely clinical correlations and expressing those clinical correlations in natural language. We evaluated the performance of the DSRM by removing the clinical correlation sections from EEG reports and measuring how well the model could recover that information from the remainder of the report. The DSRM obtained a 17% improvement over the top-performing baseline, highlighting not only the power of the DSRM but also the promise of automatically recognizing unexpected clinical correlations in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29854143PMC5977577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.