Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854107›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

Eliciting Values of Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Evaluation of a Patient-centered Framework.

Andrew B L Berry, Catherine Lim, Andrea L Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, Evette Ludman, Edward H Wagner, James D Ralston

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Core Values in the Traditional Provision of Hearing Health Care.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  3. "You Can See the Connections": Facilitating Visualization of Care Priorities in People Living with Multiple Chronic Health Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Supporting collaborative reflection on personal values and health.Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction · 2021
    Article
  6. From Reflection to Action: Combining Machine Learning with Expert Knowledge for Nutrition Goal Recommendations.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2021
    Article
  7. Facilitating Self-reflection about Values and Self-care among Individuals with Chronic Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2019
    Article
  8. Supporting Communication About Values Between People with Multiple Chronic Conditions and their Providers.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew B L BerryUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Catherine LimKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Andrea L HartzlerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tad HirschUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Evette LudmanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Edward H WagnerKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
James D RalstonUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Understanding and Honoring Patients with Multiple Chronic ConditionsR01HS022364 · AHRQ · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI RALSTON, JAMES D. · 2014 to 2016
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS022364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with multiple chronic conditions often face competing demands for care, and they often do not agree with physicians on priorities for care. Patients ' values shape their healthcare priorities, but existing methods for eliciting values do not necessarily meet patients ' care planning needs. We developed a patient-centered values framework based on a field study with patients and caregivers. In this paper we report on a survey to evaluate how the framework generalizes beyond field study participants, and how well the framework supports values elicitation. We found that respondents frame values in a way that is consistent with the framework, and that domains of the framework can be used to elicit a breadth of potential values individuals with MCC express. These findings demonstrate how a patient-centered perspective on values can expand on the domains considered in values clarification methods andfacilitate patient-provider communication in establishing shared care priorities.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePatient PreferenceComorbidityFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleNoncommunicable Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29854107
PMCPMC5977727
OpenAlexW2785855928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.