Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854102›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2017

Big data in healthcare - the promises, challenges and opportunities from a research perspective: A case study with a model database.

Mohammad Adibuzzaman, Poching DeLaurentis, Jennifer Hill, Brian D Benneyworth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Decision Support Systems.Visceral medicine · 2021
    Review
  19. Big Data in Nephrology.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad AdibuzzamanRegenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Poching DeLaurentisRegenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Jennifer HillRegenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Brian D BenneyworthChildren's Health Services Research Group, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in data collection during routine health care in the form of Electronic Health Records (EHR), medical device data (e.g., infusion pump informatics, physiological monitoring data, and insurance claims data, among others, as well as biological and experimental data, have created tremendous opportunities for biological discoveries for clinical application. However, even with all the advancement in technologies and their promises for discoveries, very few research findings have been translated to clinical knowledge, or more importantly, to clinical practice. In this paper, we identify and present the initial work addressing the relevant challenges in three broad categories: data, accessibility, and translation. These issues are discussed in the context of a widely used detailed database from an intensive care unit, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC III) database.

Indexed as

Big DataDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsIntensive Care UnitsConfidentialityData CollectionHealth Information InteroperabilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID29854102
PMCPMC5977694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.