Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854044›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2017

Development and Validation of the Microbiology for Health Sciences Concept Inventory.

Heather M Seitz, Rachel E A Horak, Megan W Howard, Lucy W Kluckhohn Jones, Theodore Muth, Christopher Parker, Andrea Pratt Rediske, Maureen M Whitehurst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identifying the core concepts of pharmacology education.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021
    Article
  5. Agar Art: a CURE for the Microbiology Laboratory.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather M SeitzJohnson County Community College, Overland Park, KS 66220.
Rachel E A HorakAmerican Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC 20036.
Megan W HowardBattelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, OH 43201.
Lucy W Kluckhohn JonesSanta Monica College, Santa Monica, CA 90405.
Theodore MuthCUNY Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY 11210.
Christopher ParkerTexas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX 76105.
Andrea Pratt RediskeUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816.
Maureen M WhitehurstTrident Technical College, Charleston, SC 29406.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying misconceptions in student learning is a valuable practice for evaluating student learning gains and directing educational interventions. By accurately identifying students' knowledge and misconceptions about microbiology concepts, instructors can design effective classroom practices centered on student understanding. Following the development of ASM's Curriculum Guidelines in 2012, we developed a concept inventory, the Microbiology for Health Sciences Concept Inventory (MHSCI), that measures learning gains and identifies student misconceptions in health sciences microbiology classrooms. The 23-question MHSCI was delivered to a wide variety of students at multiple institution types. Psychometric analysis identified that the MHSCI instrument is both discriminatory and reliable in measuring student learning gains. The MHSCI results correlated with course outcomes, showing the value of using the instrument alongside course level assessments to measure student learning. The MHSCI is a reliable and efficient way to measure student learning in microbiology and can be used both as a faculty development tool and an effective student assessment tool.

Identifiers

PMID29854044
PMCPMC5976039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.