Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29854001›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2018

Innovation in the imaging perianal fistula: a step towards personalised medicine.

Kapil Sahnan, Samuel O Adegbola, Philip J Tozer, Uday Patel, Rajpandian Ilangovan, Janindra Warusavitarne, Omar D Faiz, Ailsa L Hart, Robin K S Phillips, Phillip F C Lung

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04069728 (The Impact of 3D Anal Fistula Models on Patient Understanding and Decision Making), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04069728 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of 3D Anal Fistula Models on Patient Understanding and Decision Making

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon North West Healthcare NHS TrustRan2020 to 2021Enrolled50ConditionsFistula in Ano, Ano FistulaArmsExplanation with 3D printed fistula model, Standard explanation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kapil SahnanFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Samuel O AdegbolaFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Philip J TozerFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Uday PatelGastrointestinal Imaging, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Rajpandian IlangovanGastrointestinal Imaging, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Janindra WarusavitarneFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Omar D FaizFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Ailsa L HartFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Robin K S PhillipsFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.
Phillip F C LungFistula Research Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Harrow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerianal fistula is a topic both hard to understand and to teach. The key to understanding the treatment options and the likely success is deciphering the exact morphology of the tract(s) and the amount of sphincter involved. Our aim was to explore alternative platforms better to understand complex perianal fistulas through three-dimensional (3D) imaging and reconstruction.

methodsDigital imaging and communications in medicine images of spectral attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences were imported onto validated open-source segmentation software. A specialist consultant gastrointestinal radiologist performed segmentation of the fistula, internal and external sphincter. Segmented files were exported as stereolithography files. Cura (Ultimaker Cura 3.0.4) was used to prepare the files for printing on an Ultimaker 3 Extended 3D printer. Animations were created in collaboration with Touch Surgery™.

resultsThree examples of 3D printed models demonstrating complex perianal fistula were created. The anatomical components are displayed in different colours: red: fistula tract; green: external anal sphincter and levator plate; blue: internal anal sphincter and rectum. One of the models was created to be split in half, to display the internal opening and allow complexity in the intersphincteric space to better evaluated. An animation of MRI fistulography of a trans-sphincteric fistula tract with a cephalad extension in the intersphincteric space was also created.

conclusionMRI is the reference standard for assessment of perianal fistula, defining anatomy and guiding surgery. However, communication of findings between radiologist and surgeon remains challenging. Feasibility of 3D reconstructions of complex perianal fistula is realized, with the potential to improve surgical planning, communication with patients, and augment training.

Indexed as

3D printinginnovationMRI

Identifiers

PMID29854001
PMCPMC5971375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.