ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2018
Optimal Endoscopic Screening Interval for Early Detection of Gastric Cancer: a Single-Center Study.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a national root cause analysis system for post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- The index endoscopic characteristics associated with gastric neoplasms in serial screening of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025Article
- Impact of endoscopic surveillance on the early diagnosis and endoscopic resection likelihood of gastric cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Histopathological features of glandular atrophy of the lamina propria of the gastric mucosa during its occurrence and development.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Controlling Gastric Cancer in a World of Heterogeneous Risk.Gastroenterology · 2023Review
- Assigning a different endoscopist for each annual follow-up may contribute to improved gastric cancer detection rates.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Impact of the Interval between Previous Endoscopic Exam and Diagnosis on the Mortality and Treatment Modality of Undifferentiated-Type Gastric Cancer.Journal of gastric cancer · 2021Article
- Screening for gastric cancer in China: Advances, challenges and visions.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021Article
- Deconvolution of diffuse gastric cancer and the suppression of CD34 on the BALB/c nude mice model.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Improving Efficacy of Endoscopic Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer: Gaps to Overcome from the Real-World Practice in Vietnam.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- The More, the Better: Is This True in Endoscopy for Gastric Cancer Screening?Clinical endoscopy · 2018Article
- Screening Upper Endoscopy for Early Detection of Gastric Cancer.Journal of Korean medical science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal endoscopic screening interval for early gastric cancer (EGC) detection still remains controversial. Thus, we performed this prospective study to clarify the optimal interval between endoscopic examinations for EGC detection.
methodsA questionnaire survey for penultimate endoscopy and gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis interval was used; the findings were then analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to GC type and endoscopic examinations intervals.
resultsA total of 843 patients were enrolled. The endoscopic GC detection interval (
conclusionTriennial endoscopic screening might be as effective as biennial screening in increasing the detection rate of EGC and the risk of subsequent curable endoscopic resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.