Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29853607›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2018

Itraconazole targets cell cycle heterogeneity in colorectal cancer.

Simon J A Buczacki, Semiramis Popova, Emma Biggs, Chrysa Koukorava, Jon Buzzelli, Louis Vermeulen, Lee Hazelwood, Hayley Francies, Mathew J Garnett, Douglas J Winton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Colorectal cancer cell dormancy: An insight into pathways.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon J A BuczackiCancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, England, UK simon.buczacki@cruk.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2975-416X
Semiramis PopovaCancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3200-4247
Emma BiggsCancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, England, UK.
Chrysa KoukoravaCancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, England, UK.
Jon BuzzelliCancer Research UK/Medical Research Council Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology (OIRO), Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Louis VermeulenLaboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lee HazelwoodCancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, England, UK.
Hayley FranciesWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, England, UK.
Mathew J GarnettWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, England, UK.
Douglas J WintonCancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge, England, UK doug.winton@cruk.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-7927
Cancer Research UK · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16485Cancer Research UK 17044Cancer Research UK C14094/A16485Cancer Research UK C44943/A22536Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 102696Worldwide Cancer Research 14-1164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular dormancy and heterogeneity in cell cycle length provide important explanations for treatment failure after adjuvant therapy with S-phase cytotoxics in colorectal cancer (CRC), yet the molecular control of the dormant versus cycling state remains unknown. We sought to understand the molecular features of dormant CRC cells to facilitate rationale identification of compounds to target both dormant and cycling tumor cells. Unexpectedly, we demonstrate that dormant CRC cells are differentiated, yet retain clonogenic capacity. Mouse organoid drug screening identifies that itraconazole generates spheroid collapse and loss of dormancy. Human CRC cell dormancy and tumor growth can also be perturbed by itraconazole, which is found to inhibit Wnt signaling through noncanonical hedgehog signaling. Preclinical validation shows itraconazole to be effective in multiple assays through Wnt inhibition, causing both cycling and dormant cells to switch to global senescence. These data provide preclinical evidence to support an early phase trial of itraconazole in CRC.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle CheckpointsCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SeparationCellular SenescenceColorectal NeoplasmsHumansItraconazoleMiceNeoplastic Stem CellsOrganoidsPhenotypeReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledItraconazoleLgr5 protein, mouseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Identifiers

PMID29853607
PMCPMC6028508
OpenAlexW2805835666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.