Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29852030›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018

Association of Genetic Variants With Response to Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Laura Lorés-Motta, Moeen Riaz, Michelle Grunin, Jordi Corominas, Freekje van Asten, Marc Pauper, Mathieu Leenders, Andrea J Richardson, Philipp Muether, Angela J Cree and 24 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biomedicines · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Analysis of ocular fluid in patients with ranibizumab-recalcitrant neovascular age-related macular degeneration who have serum anti-ranibizumab antibodies.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 19 institutions in 10 countries.

Laura Lorés-MottaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Moeen RiazCentre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Surgery in Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle GruninDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Hadassah Medical Center-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
Jordi CorominasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Freekje van AstenDivision of Epidemiology and Clinical Application, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Marc PauperDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Mathieu LeendersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Andrea J RichardsonCentre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Surgery in Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Philipp MuetherDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Angela J CreeClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
Helen L GriffithsClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
Connie PhamDepartment Ophthalmology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Claude BelangerDepartment Ophthalmology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Magda A Meester-SmoorDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Manir AliSection of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
Iris M HeidDepartment of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Lars G FritscheNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Usha ChakravarthyQueen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Richard GaleThe York Hospital, York, England.
Martin McKibbinEye Clinic, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, England.
Chris F InglehearnSection of Ophthalmology and Neuroscience, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
Reinier O SchlingemannDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ocular Angiogenesis Group, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amer OmarMontreal Retina Institute, Westmount, Québec, Canada.
John ChenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Robert K KoenekoopDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Sascha FauserDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Robyn H GuymerCentre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Surgery in Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carel B HoyngDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Eiko K de JongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Andrew J LoteryClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
Paul MitchellCentre for Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology and Westmead Millennium Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Anneke I den HollanderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Paul N BairdCentre for Eye Research Australia, Department of Surgery in Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Itay ChowersDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Hadassah Medical Center-Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.
McGill University Health Centre · CARadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Southampton · GBHadassah Medical Center · ILUniversity of Leeds · GBAcademic Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLMonash University · AUNational Institutes of Health · USNorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOQueen's University Belfast · GBRoche (Switzerland) · CHSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DEWestmead Institute for Medical Research · AUYork Hospital · GB

Funding

CIHRDepartment of Health 07/36/01NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201200008I
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Visual acuity (VA) outcomes differ considerably among patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs. Identification of pharmacogenetic associations may help clinicians understand the mechanisms underlying this variability as well as pave the way for personalized treatment in nAMD. Objective: To identify genetic factors associated with variability in the response to anti-VEGF therapy for patients with nAMD. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter genome-wide association study, 678 patients with nAMD with genome-wide genotyping data were included in the discovery phase; 1380 additional patients with nAMD were genotyped for selected common variants in the replication phase. All participants received 3 monthly injections of bevacizumab or ranibizumab. Clinical data were evaluated for inclusion/exclusion criteria from October 2014 to October 2015, followed by data analysis from October 2015 to February 2016. For replication cohort genotyping, clinical data collection and analysis (including meta-analysis) was performed from March 2016 to April 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Change in VA after the loading dose of 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections compared with baseline. Results: Of the 2058 included patients, 1210 (58.8%) were women, and the mean (SD) age across all cohorts was 78 (7.4) years. Patients included in the discovery cohort and most of the patients in the replication cohorts were of European descent. The mean (SD) baseline VA was 51.3 (20.3) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score letters, and the mean (SD) change in VA after the loading dose of 3 monthly injections was a gain of 5.1 (13.9) ETDRS score letters (ie, 1-line gain). Genome-wide single-variant analyses of common variants revealed 5 independent loci that reached a P value less than 10 × 10-5. After replication and meta-analysis of the lead variants, rs12138564 located in the CCT3 gene remained nominally associated with a better treatment outcome (ETDRS letter gain, 1.7; β, 0.034; SE, 0.008; P = 1.38 × 10-5). Genome-wide gene-based optimal unified sequence kernel association test of rare variants showed genome-wide significant associations for the C10orf88 (P = 4.22 × 10-7) and UNC93B1 (P = 6.09 × 10-7) genes, in both cases leading to a worse treatment outcome. Patients carrying rare variants in the C10orf88 and UNC93B1 genes lost a mean (SD) VA of 30.6 (17.4) ETDRS score letters (ie, loss of 6.09 lines) and 26.5 (13.8) ETDRS score letters (ie, loss of 5.29 lines), respectively, after 3 months of anti-VEGF treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: We propose that there is a limited contribution of common genetic variants to variability in nAMD treatment response. Our results suggest that rare protein-altering variants in the C10orf88 and UNC93B1 genes are associated with a worse response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with nAMD, but these results require further validation in other cohorts.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabChoroidal NeovascularizationChromosomes, Human, Pair 10FemaleGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping TechniquesHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMembrane Transport ProteinsMiddle AgedOpen Reading FramesAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabMembrane Transport ProteinsRanibizumabUNC93B1 protein, humanVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29852030
PMCPMC6142943
OpenAlexW2807659348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.