ReviewPLoS genetics2018
Outstanding questions in the study of archaic hominin admixture.
Review in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic approaches for understanding the evolution of the human brain.Nature neuroscience · 2026Review
- Employing Common Morality to Address Ethical Issues in Genetics Research With Indigenous People: The Ọmọlúàbí Ideology.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Review
- Recovering signatures of archaic introgression using ancestral recombination graphs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Interbreeding between Neanderthals and modern humans was strongly sex biased.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the 3D genome organization of Neanderthals reveals that chromatin folding shaped phenotypic and sequence divergence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Archaic introgression and the distribution of shared variation under stabilizing selection.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Early human migration determines the risk of being attacked by wolves: ethnic gene diversity on the development of systemic lupus erythematosus.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2024Review
- Recurrent gene flow between Neanderthals and modern humans over the past 200,000 years.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Ancient and recent origins of shared polymorphisms in yeast.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Article
- Integrating sex-bias into studies of archaic introgression on chromosome X.PLoS genetics · 2023Article
- Comparative physiological anthropogeny: exploring molecular underpinnings of distinctly human phenotypes.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Large-scale functional screen identifies genetic variants with splicing effects in modern and archaic humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Genetics in the X-Men film franchise: mutants as allegories of difference.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Predicting Archaic Hominin Phenotypes from Genomic Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022Review
- Apportioning archaic variants among modern populations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Modern human incursion into Neanderthal territories 54,000 years ago at Mandrin, France.Science advances · 2022Article
- Human reproduction is regulated by retrotransposons derived from ancient Hominidae-specific viral infections.Nature communications · 2022Article
- A Brain Region-Specific Expression Profile for Genes Within Large Introgression Deserts and Under Positive Selection inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Inferring archaic introgression from hominin genetic data.Evolutionary anthropology · 2021Review
- A novel system for classifying tooth root phenotypes.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The complete sequencing of archaic and modern human genomes has revolutionized the study of human history and evolution. The application of paleogenomics has answered questions that were beyond the scope of archaeology alone-definitively proving admixture between archaic and modern humans. Despite the remarkable progress made in the study of archaic-modern human admixture, many outstanding questions remain. Here, we review some of these questions, which include how frequent archaic-modern human admixture was in history, to what degree drift and selection are responsible for the loss and retention of introgressed sequences in modern human genomes, and how surviving archaic sequences affect human phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.