Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29851960›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2018

Microsaccade-rhythmic modulation of neural synchronization and coding within and across cortical areas V1 and V2.

Eric Lowet, Bart Gips, Mark J Roberts, Peter De Weerd, Ole Jensen, Jan van der Eerden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neurons of Macaque Frontal Eye Field Signal Reward-Related Surprise.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Rethinking Stereotypies in Autism.Seminars in pediatric neurology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The Common Rhythm of Action and Perception.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  13. Functional Specialization in the Attention Network.Annual review of psychology · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Neuronal Oscillations in Visual Active Sensing.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eric LowetFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9793-0639
Bart GipsRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Mark J RobertsFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Peter De WeerdFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Ole JensenCentre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Jan van der EerdenRadboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates sample their visual environment actively through saccades and microsaccades (MSs). Saccadic eye movements not only modulate neural spike rates but might also affect temporal correlations (synchrony) among neurons. Neural synchrony plays a role in neural coding and modulates information transfer between cortical areas. The question arises of how eye movements shape neural synchrony within and across cortical areas and how it affects visual processing. Through local field recordings in macaque early visual cortex while monitoring eye position and through neural network simulations, we find 2 distinct synchrony regimes in early visual cortex that are embedded in a 3- to 4-Hz MS-related rhythm during visual fixation. In the period shortly after an MS ("transient period"), synchrony was high within and between cortical areas. In the subsequent period ("sustained period"), overall synchrony dropped and became selective to stimulus properties. Only mutually connected neurons with similar stimulus responses exhibited sustained narrow-band gamma synchrony (25-80 Hz), both within and across cortical areas. Recordings in macaque V1 and V2 matched the model predictions. Furthermore, our modeling provides predictions on how (micro)saccade-modulated gamma synchrony in V1 shapes V2 receptive fields (RFs). We suggest that the rhythmic alternation between synchronization regimes represents a basic repeating sampling strategy of the visual system.

Indexed as

Cortical SynchronizationModels, NeurologicalSaccadesAnimalsMacaca mulattaMaleVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID29851960
PMCPMC5997357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.