Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29851955›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Effects of different slipping methods on the mortality of sardine, Sardina pilchardus, after purse-seine capture off the Portuguese Southern coast (Algarve).

Ana Marçalo, Pedro M Guerreiro, Luís Bentes, Mafalda Rangel, Pedro Monteiro, Frederico Oliveira, Carlos M L Afonso, Pedro Pousão-Ferreira, Hugues P Benoît, Mike Breen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ana MarçaloCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0485-341X
Pedro M GuerreiroCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Luís BentesCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Mafalda RangelCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Pedro MonteiroCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Frederico OliveiraCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Carlos M L AfonsoCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Pedro Pousão-FerreiraIPMA - Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere/EPPO - Aquaculture Research Station, Olhão, Portugal.
Hugues P BenoîtFisheries and Oceans Canada, Gulf Fisheries Centre, University Avenue, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Mike BreenInstitute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway.
Karim ErziniCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.
Jorge M S GonçalvesCentre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of the Algarve, Faro, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of two different slipping methods on the survival, physical and physiological response of sardines, Sardina pilchardus, captured in a purse-seine fishery were investigated in southern Portugal. Sardines were collected and transferred into holding tanks onboard a commercial fishing vessel after being captured, crowded and deliberately released using two slipping procedures: standard and modified. The standard slipping procedure aggregated fish at high densities and made them "roll over" the floatline, while the modified procedure aggregated the fish at moderate densities and enabled them to escape through an opening created by adding weights to the floatline. Both slipping methods were compared with minimally harmed non-slipped sardines (sardines collected from the loose pocket of the purse seine). Survival rates were monitored in captivity over 28 days using three replicates for each treatment. The estimated survival of sardines was 43.6% for the non-slipped fish, 44.7% for the modified slipping and 11.7% for the standard slipping treatments. Scale loss indicated the level of physical impact experienced, with dead fish from the non-slipped and modified slipping technique showing significantly lower scale loss than those fish from the standard slipping treatment within the same period. Of the physiological indicators of stress measured, cortisol, glucose, lactate and osmolality attained peak values during slipping and up to the first hours after introduction to captivity. This work indicates that although delayed mortality after release may be substantial, appropriately modified slipping techniques significantly enhance survival of slipped sardines.

Indexed as

CrowdingFisheriesStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsFishesPortugalSeafood

Identifiers

PMID29851955
PMCPMC5978792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.