Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29851894›Full record

Trial reportEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2018

Mediation of Neighborhood Effects on Adolescent Substance Use by the School and Peer Environments.

Kara E Rudolph, Oleg Sofrygin, Nicole M Schmidt, Rebecca Crowder, M Maria Glymour, Jennifer Ahern, Theresa L Osypuk

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Reporting Quality of Observational Studies That Use Mediation Analyses.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Complier stochastic direct effects: identification and robust estimation.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neighborhood Structural Factors and Proximal Risk for Youth Substance Use.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kara E RudolphFrom the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Oleg SofryginDivision of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Nicole M SchmidtDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
Rebecca CrowderFrom the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
M Maria GlymourDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Jennifer AhernFrom the Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Theresa L OsypukDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Minnesota Population Center Science and Technical CoreP2CHD041023 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI THERESA LOUISE OSYPUK · 2016 to 2026
$4.3M
Effects of a housing policy experiment on youth behavioral problemsR01MD006064 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OSYPUK, THERESA LOUISE · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
Mechanisms linking neighborhood poverty to problematic adolescent drug useR00DA042127 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI RUDOLPH, KARA ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2021
$889k
Mechanisms Underlying Differential Effects of Neighborhood Poverty on Problematic Adolescent Drug UseK99DA042127 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RUDOLPH, KARA ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2017
$309k
Moderators and mediators of housing mobility effects on youth risky behaviorsR03HD082679 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SCHMIDT, NICOLE MARIE · 2015 to 2016
$125k
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041023NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD082679NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA042127NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA042127NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD006064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that aspects of the neighborhood environment may influence risk of problematic drug use among adolescents. Our objective was to examine mediating roles of aspects of the school and peer environments on the effect of receiving a Section 8 housing voucher and using it to move out of public housing on adolescent substance use outcomes.

methodsWe used data from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) experiment that randomized receipt of a Section 8 housing voucher. Hypothesized mediators included school climate, safety, peer drug use, and participation in an after-school sport or club. We applied a doubly robust, semiparametric estimator to longitudinal MTO data to estimate stochastic direct and indirect effects of randomization on cigarette use, marijuana use, and problematic drug use. Stochastic direct and indirect effects differ from natural direct and indirect effects in that they do not require assuming no posttreatment confounder of the mediator-outcome relationship. Such an assumption would be at odds with any causal model that reflects an intervention affecting a mediator and outcome through adherence to treatment assignment.

resultsHaving friends who use drugs and involvement in after-school sports or clubs partially mediated the effect of housing voucher receipt on adolescent substance use (e.g., stochastic indirect effect 0.45% [95% confidence interval: 0.12%, 0.79%] for having friends who use drugs and 0.04% [95% confidence interval: -0.02%, 0.10%] for involvement in after-school sports or clubs mediating the relationship between housing voucher receipt and marijuana use among boys). However, these mediating effects were small, contributing only fractions of a percent to the effect of voucher receipt on probability of substance use. No school environment variables were mediators.

conclusionsMeasured school- and peer-environment variables played little role in mediating the effect of housing voucher receipt on subsequent adolescent substance use.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorResidence CharacteristicsSchoolsSocial EnvironmentAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePeer GroupPublic HousingRisk AssessmentStochastic ProcessesSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID29851894
PMCPMC5987191
OpenAlexW2806351387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.