Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29851844›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Effect produced on ground reaction forces by a prefabricated, weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing foot orthosis in the treatment of pronated foot: Pilot study.

Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron, Inmaculada Palomo-Toucedo, Alejandro Gil-Tinoco, Ana Belen Ortega-Avila, Pedro Vicente Munuera-Martínez

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gabriel Gijon-NogueronDepartment of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Malaga, Malaga Department of Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain Musculoskeletal Department North Tee and Hartlepool, NHS Hartlepool, UK.
Inmaculada Palomo-Toucedo
Alejandro Gil-Tinoco
Ana Belen Ortega-Avila
Pedro Vicente Munuera-Martínez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to explore the changes in ground reaction force (GRF) produced by custom-made weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing foot orthoses and by a prefabricated foot orthosis, in the control of the pronated foot.

methodsThirty-nine participants were recruited. All were in good health, aged 18 to 25 years, and presented pronated foot. Three different types of foot orthosis were studied: prefabricated, weight-bearing, and nonweight-bearing.

resultsNo significant differences were observed in the phases of the gait cycle between the prefabricated, the weight-bearing, and the nonweight-bearing foot orthoses.

conclusionsNeither prefabricated insoles nor custom-made orthoses (weight-bearing or nonweight-bearing) modified GRF.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEquipment DesignFemaleFlatfootFootHumansMalePilot ProjectsWeight-BearingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29851844
PMCPMC6393007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.