Trial reportMedicine2018
Efficacy and safety of acupuncture at a single BL1 acupoint in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye disease: Protocol for a randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Optimal acupuncture protocol improving symptoms of typical dry eye syndrome: meta-analysis and systematic review.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Alternative therapies for dry eye disease.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Acupoint selection for the treatment of dry eye: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Dry Eye Disease: A Review of Epidemiology in Taiwan, and its Clinical Treatment and Merits.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDry eye disease (DED) is a very common disease. Although several current treatments offer some symptomatic relief, moderate to severe DED is still difficult to cure at present. Acupuncture may be effective for DED via its promotion of tear secretion and ability to improve symptoms, but evidence of its effectiveness is limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of acupuncture versus artificial tears in moderate to severe DED. METHODS/
designA total of 120 participants with moderate to severe DED will be randomly assigned to either an acupuncture group or an artificial tear group at a ratio of 1:1. Participants in the acupuncture group will undergo treatments on a single BL1 acupuncture point 3 times per week for 8 weeks. Participants in the control group will use artificial tears 4 times per day for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be the change from baseline in a mean Schirmer-I test (SIT) at week 8. The secondary outcomes will include the visual analog score (VAS) for the improvement of ocular symptoms, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), the tear film break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) at weeks 4, 8, and 32. Acupuncture acceptance will be evaluated at week 8. Adverse events will also be monitored and documented. A follow-up assessment will be conducted 24 weeks after the treatment. DISCUSSION: We expect to verify that acupuncture is better than artificial tears toward improving the mean SIT values of patients with moderate to severe DED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.