ArticleMedicine2018
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between endoscope-assisted technique and handheld acoustic Doppler for perforator identification in fasciocutaneous flaps.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endoscopic technique has been utilized to harvest muscle flaps and detect perforators of fasciocutaneous flaps. This study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes between the endoscope-assisted technique and handheld acoustic Doppler for perforator identification in fasciocutaneous flaps.This retrospective case-control study included patients who underwent fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction for traumatic soft tissue defects. In the case group, perforator identification was assisted by the endoscope-assisted technique. In the control group, age- and sex-matched patients received handheld acoustic Doppler to detect perforators. Perioperative outcomes, flap characteristics, and postoperative complications were compared.There were 12 patients in the case group and 12 in the control group. Compared with the control group, the case group had a significantly shorter length of donor-site wounds (9 cm vs 12 cm, P = .023) and a significantly smaller proportion of patients receiving skin grafting at the donor sites (0% vs 41.7%, P = .037). The case group had a longer operative time, but the difference was not statistically significant (180 minutes vs 150 minutes, P = .367). The amount of blood loss, the time length of postoperative drainage, and complications did not significantly differ between the 2 groups.The endoscope-assisted technique for perforator identification of fasciocutaneous flaps provided less donor-site morbidity and a significantly shorter length of donor-site wounds than the conventional handheld acoustic Doppler, which suggests that this technique could be a valuable alternative when a precise design is indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.