ArticleMedicine2018
Acute exacerbation of staphylococcal catarrhal infiltration associated with treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical diagnosis and treatment of rare painless keratitis caused by three pathogens: clinical practice and experiential discussion.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleSimultaneous presentation of peripheral infiltrates, which can be easily misidentified as satellite lesions, is rarely observed in patients with acute infectious keratitis. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 70-year-old woman was referred to our clinic due to acute mucopurulent keratitis following application of a therapeutic soft contact lens for the treatment of epithelial defects caused by entrance of soil foreign bodies into the eye. The patient was diagnosed with Pseudomonas keratitis, following which she was treated with alternating administration of fourth-generation fluoroquinolone (Vigamox) and 5% fortified ceftazidime eyedrops every 2 hours. Although infectious keratitis rapidly improved, discrete catarrhal infiltrates at the corneolimbal junction (10- to 2-o'clock and 7- to 8-o'clock positions) were rapidly aggravated, forming bead-like stromal pustules inversely proportional to the extent of Pseudomonas keratitis. DIAGNOSIS: Acute exacerbation of staphylococcal catarrhal infiltration associated with treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis.
interventionsAddition of 1% prednisone acetate eyedrops (Pred Forte) four times per day. OUTCOMES: Dramatic improvement was observed at the sites of catarrhal infiltration without recurrence of infectious keratitis. LESSONS: Clinicians should thus remain aware of the risk for co-occurring non-infectious, immune-related keratitis, as treatment for infectious keratitis may induce significant aggravation of non-infectious keratitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.