Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29851117›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2018

The impact of hypertension, hemorrhage, and other maternal morbidities on functioning in the postpartum period as assessed by the WHODAS 2.0 36-item tool.

José P Guida, Maria L Costa, Mary A Parpinelli, Rodolfo C Pacagnella, Elton C Ferreira, Jussara Mayrink, Carla Silveira, Renato T Souza, Maria H Sousa, Lale Say and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Functional status of women with and without potentially life-threatening maternal conditions after 6 months postpartum: A cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nursing care for women with HELLP syndrome: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of Preeclampsia in Brazil: An Integrative Review.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Postpartum blood pressure patterns in severe preeclampsia and normotensive pregnant women following abdominal deliveries: a cohort study.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2020
    Article
  17. Reference ranges of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) score and diagnostic validity of its 12-item version in identifying altered functioning in healthy postpartum women.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

José P GuidaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria L CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Mary A ParpinelliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodolfo C PacagnellaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elton C FerreiraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jussara MayrinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carla SilveiraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria H SousaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lale SayUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Doris ChouUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Veronique FilippiDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Maria BarreixUNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kelli BarbourDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Affette McCaw-BinnsDepartment of Community Health and Psychiatry, University of the West Indies, Mona, Kingston, Jamaica.
Peter von DadelszenMolecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
José G CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Brazilian Cohort on Severe Maternal Morbidity (COMMAG) study group and the WHO Maternal Morbidity Working Group (MMWG)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRWorld Health Organization · CHLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of the West Indies System · JMUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the scores of postpartum women using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item tool (WHODAS-36), considering different morbidities.

methodsSecondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of women who delivered at a referral maternity in Brazil and were classified with and without severe maternal morbidity (SMM). WHODAS-36 was used to assess functioning in postpartum women. Percentile distribution of total WHODAS score was compared across three groups: Percentile (P)<10, 10<P<90, and P>90. Cases of SMM were categorized and WHODAS-36 score was assessed according to hypertension, hemorrhage, or other conditions.

resultsA total of 638 women were enrolled: 64 had mean scores below P<10 (1.09) and 66 were above P>90 (41.3). Of women scoring above P>90, those with morbidity had a higher mean score than those without (44.6% vs 36.8%, P=0.879). Women with higher WHODAS-36 scores presented more complications during pregnancy, especially hypertension (47.0% vs 37.5%, P=0.09). Mean scores among women with any complication were higher than those with no morbidity (19.0 vs 14.2, P=0.01). WHODAS-36 scores were higher among women with hypertensive complications (19.9 vs 16.0, P=0.004), but lower among those with hemorrhagic complications (13.8 vs 17.7, P=0.09).

conclusionsComplications during pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium increase long-term WHODAS-36 scores, demonstrating a persistent impact on functioning among women, up to 5 years postpartum.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodBrazilDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansHypertensionMorbidityParturitionPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesHemorrhageHypertensionMaternal morbidityPregnancyWHODAS 2.0

Identifiers

PMID29851117
PMCPMC6001578
OpenAlexW2805616763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.