Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29850962›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2018

Evaluation of the effects of Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, and two different desensitizers on dentin permeability: in vitro study.

Sevda Kurt, Tuğrul Kırtıloğlu, Nasibe Aycan Yılmaz, Ertan Ertaş, Hasan Oruçoğlu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sevda KurtDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey. dt.sevdakurt@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-6520
Tuğrul KırtıloğluDepartment of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Nasibe Aycan YılmazDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey.
Ertan ErtaşDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
Hasan OruçoğluDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
Ondokuz Mayıs University · TRAdnan Menderes University · TRBolu Abant İzzet Baysal University · TRRecep Tayyip Erdoğan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, PrevDent nano-hydroxyapatite toothpaste plus Repairing Serum Kit (PNH), and NUPRO Sensodyne Prophylaxis Paste with NovaMin (NPP) on dentin permeability reduction. Forty dentin discs obtained from bovine incisors were divided into four study groups: Er:YAG laser-treated (2940 nm; 0.2 W, 80 mJ/pulse, 3 Hz); Nd:YAG laser-treated (1064 nm; 1 W, 10 Hz); PNH-treated; and NPP-treated groups. The quantitative changes in permeability of each dentin disc were measured using a computerized fluid filtration method (CFFM) before and after desensitizer treatments. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon, paired-samples t, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U tests. The dentin surfaces and tubules were also morphologically detected by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In all groups, dentin permeability was significantly reduced after the desensitizer and laser treatments (p < 0.05). Among the groups, we detected a significant difference in only when comparing the Er:YAG laser- and NPP-treated groups (p = 0.034). SEM analysis revealed physical changes in the dentin surface in all groups. This in vitro study shows that all tested desensitizers and laser treatments reduced dentin permeability. Also, surface changes, such as complete or partial occlusion or shrinkage of dentin tubules, were observed in all groups. Although the laser groups performed best, the PNH protocol can be considered as an alternative therapeutic product. In addition, clinical and laboratory studies should be performed for this product, and their efficacy should be assessed by combined therapy with lasers.

Indexed as

Dentin PermeabilityLasers, Solid-StateAnimalsCattleDentinDentin Desensitizing AgentsDrug CombinationsDurapatiteFluoridesGlassNanoparticlesNitratesPhosphatesDentin Desensitizing AgentsDrug CombinationsDurapatiteFluoridesNitratesNovaMinPhosphatesSensodyneComputerized fluid filtration deviceDentin permeabilityDentin sensitivityLaser

Identifiers

PMID29850962
OpenAlexW2805570031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.