ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2018
Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: preoperative imaging and evaluation.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Stent-Strut Morphology on Iliac Limb Hemodynamics During EVAR in Compliant 3D-Printed Arterial Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Aorto-Duodenal Fistula After Emergency Endovascular Repair of a 14-cm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in a 68-Year-Old Man.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- AI-driven decision making for intravascular device selection in aortic disease. Current insights and prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Optimizing Arterial Vessel Contrast in Portal Venous Phase with Virtual Monoenergetic Images from Photon-Counting Detector CT Scans of the Abdomen-First Clinical Experiences.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Vascular imaging for anaesthetists and intensivists, part 2: clinical applications.BJA education · 2022Review
- Renal outcomes of suprarenalCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2022Review
- AAA Revisited: A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors, Management, and Hallmarks of Pathogenesis.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging is a critical component of the pre-procedure evaluation and planning of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Imaging is the mainstay for proper assessment of procedural candidacy, relevant vascular anatomy, device selection, and surgical approach. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has long been considered the preferred modality for pre-operative imaging and evaluation prior to EVAR. Recently, advances in image quality and software technology have further enhanced the proceduralist's ability to plan and perform EVAR. In this review, we highlight the current state of the art to provide interventionalists a contemporary assessment of the available tools for pre-operative imaging and evaluation prior to EVAR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.