Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29850290›Full record

ArticleCase reports in endocrinology2018

Wolfram Syndrome: A Case Report and Review of Clinical Manifestations, Genetics Pathophysiology, and Potential Therapies.

N B Toppings, J M McMillan, P Y B Au, O Suchowersky, L E Donovan

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in endocrinology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Wolfram Syndrome 1: From Genetics to Therapy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Metabolic Treatment of Wolfram Syndrome.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N B ToppingsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-3180
J M McMillanDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
P Y B AuDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
O SuchowerskyDepartments of Medicine, Medical Genetics and Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
L E DonovanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8911-8192
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClassical Wolfram syndrome (WS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in CASE: We describe a woman without risk factors for gestational or type 2 diabetes who presented with gestational diabetes (GDM) at the age of 39 years during her first and only pregnancy. Although she had optic atrophy since the age of 10 years, WS was not considered as her diagnosis until she presented with GDM. Biallelic mutations in

conclusionsThe distinct natural history, complications, and differences in management reinforce the importance of distinguishing WS from other forms of diabetes. Recent advances in the genetics and pathophysiology of WS have led to promising new therapeutic considerations that may preserve

Identifiers

PMID29850290
PMCPMC5932515
OpenAlexW2802336084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.