Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29850250›Full record

ReviewEmergency medicine international2018

The Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Detecting Small Bowel Obstruction in Emergency Department.

A Pourmand, U Dimbil, A Drake, H Shokoohi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency medicine international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Emergency Setting.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Ultrasound of Small Bowel Obstruction: A Pictorial Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A PourmandDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8440-8454
U DimbilDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
A DrakeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
H ShokoohiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-3594
George Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiological imaging plays an essential role in the evaluation of a patient with suspected small bowel obstruction (SBO). In a few studies, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has been utilized as a primary imaging modality in patients with suspected SBO. POCUS has been shown to be an accurate tool in the diagnosis of SBO with multiple research studies noting a consistent high sensitivity with a range of 94-100% and specificity of 81-100%. Specific sonographic findings that increase the likelihood of SBO include dilatation of small bowel loops > 25 mm, altered intestinal peristalsis, increased thickness of the bowel wall, and intraperitoneal fluid accumulation. Studies also reported that emergency physicians could apply this technique with limited and short-term ultrasound training. In this article, we aim to review the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound examinations performed by emergency physicians in patients with suspected SBO.

Identifiers

PMID29850250
PMCPMC5904810
OpenAlexW2795651542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.