Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29850122›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018

Uniport versus multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the perioperative treatment of patients with T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xinyu Yang, Ming Li, Xiaodong Yang, Mengnan Zhao, Yiwei Huang, Xiyu Dai, Tian Jiang, Mingxiang Feng, Cheng Zhan, Qun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. UniportJournal of thoracic disease · 2021
    Article
  19. Role of GdOncology letters · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinyu YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Ming LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaodong YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Mengnan ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yiwei HuangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiyu DaiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Tian JiangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Mingxiang FengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Cheng ZhanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Qun WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has emerged as a less invasive approach for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether uniport VATS has more potential advantages over multiport VATS remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the perioperative efficacy of uniport and multiport VATS for T1-3N0M0 NSCLC.

methodsAn electronic and manual search of literature published before 1st October 2017 was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Wiley Online library. The effective values of dichotomous variables or continuous variables were estimated by odds ratios (OR) or by standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) respectively.

resultsEleven relevant observational studies were included for meta-analysis. Results demonstrated that patients in the uniport group had a significant reduction in the duration of postoperative drainage (uniport: 4.39±2.48

conclusionsUniport VATS might have represent a preferable option for the treatment of T1-3N0M0 NSCLC, due to its superior perioperative efficacy.

Indexed as

meta-analysismulti-portNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)perioperative efficacysingle-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID29850122
PMCPMC5949473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.