Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29849973›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2018

On the search of the ideal barrier membrane for guided bone regeneration.

Jordi Caballé-Serrano, Antonio Munar-Frau, Octavi Ortiz-Puigpelat, David Soto-Penaloza, Miguel Peñarrocha, Federico Hernández-Alfaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Experimental study on the causes of spontaneous osteogenesis of Masquelet technique induced membrane].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  11. Research status and prospects of biodegradable magnesium-based metal guided bone regeneration membranes.Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Platelet rich fibrin is not a barrier membrane! Or is it?World journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Effect of Polylactic Acid Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration in Anterior Maxillary Implantation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordi Caballé-SerranoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio Munar-FrauDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Octavi Ortiz-PuigpelatDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
David Soto-PenalozaDepartment of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Spain.
Miguel PeñarrochaDepartment of Oral Surgery, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Spain.
Federico Hernández-AlfaroDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGBRs are essential procedures in implant dentistry and periodontology where barrier membranes play an important role by isolating soft tissue and allowing bone to grow. Not all membranes function the same way, as they differ from their origin and structure, it is important to understand how membranes behave and differ one from others in order to achieve a predictable treatment. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic search on Medline by two independent reviewers was performed for articles published until July 2017 reporting the characteristics or properties of barrier membranes. The question that preceded the search was designed according to PICO rules.

resultsA total of 124 articles were initially identified from electronic searching. After abstract/full-text review, 21 were included for a systematic review. According to the extracted data and article analysis, barrier membranes should fulfill the following criteria in order to success: biocompatibility, space maintaining, occlusive function, easy - handling and a bioactivation friendly property. With the development of new biomaterials and surfaces, a great advance in this area is expected.

conclusionsIt has been clearly described that biocompatibility is the most important requirement to take into account when choosing a membrane, but other factors such as space maintaining capacity, cell oclusiveness, easy handling and bioactivation friendly materials are the ones that will fulfill our necessities.

Identifiers

PMID29849973
PMCPMC5971071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.