ArticleOncotarget2018
Circulating cell free DNA as the diagnostic marker for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and prognostic significance of ALU-based cell-free DNA in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of various liquid biopsy methods in detecting colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: redefining surgical decision-making.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Pre-analytical storage effects on ALU- and LINE1-derived cell-free DNA biomarkers in whole blood and plasma.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- Navigating the Landscape of Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Current Insights and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Evaluating circulating cell-free DNA and DNA integrity index as biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- The Position of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Clinical Management of Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Relationship between plasma cell-free DNA changes and lysyl oxidase during the treatment and prognosis of canine transmissible venereal tumors.BMC veterinary research · 2022Article
- Article
- Predicting Colorectal Cancer Occurrence in IBD.Cancers · 2021Review
- What Is Known about Theragnostic Strategies in Colorectal Cancer.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer Patients With a Plasma-Based Real-Time PCR Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- ctDNA applications and integration in colorectal cancer: an NCI Colon and Rectal-Anal Task Forces whitepaper.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020Review
- The Liquid Biopsy in the Management of Colorectal Cancer: An Overview.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer.Intestinal research · 2020Review
- The paradox of cancer genes in non-malignant conditions: implications for precision medicine.Genome medicine · 2020Review
- Limited Utility of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Integrity as a Diagnostic Tool for Differentiating Between Malignant and Benign Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Cytology (Bethesda Category III).Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative analyses of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are suggested to be a promising method for the detection of colorectal cancer, validated clinical relevance of cfDNA has not been published so far. Though some of the inconsistent results were published. This study is the first meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer.
resultsFourteen studies concerning a quantitative analysis of circulating cfDNA for the diagnosis of colorectal cancer met the inclusion criteria. Data includes 1,258 patients with colorectal cancer and 803 healthy individuals as control was analyzed. The summary estimates were as follow: sensitivity, 0.735 (95% CI 0.713-0.757); specificity, 0.918 (95% CI, 0.900-0.934); positive likelihood ratio, 8.295 (95% CI, 5.037-13.659); negative likelihood ratio, 0.300 (95% CI, 0.231-0.391); diagnostic odds ratio, 30.783 (95% CI, 16.965-55.856); and area under the curve, 0.8818 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), respectively. Publication bias was not evident with Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test ( MATERIALS AND
methodsA systematic literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception to August 07, 2017. Analyses were conducted by Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Stata 12.0. Diagnostic accuracy in sensitivity, specificity and aspects were pooled. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Clinical utility of the cfDNA was evaluated by Fagan nomogram.
conclusionsOur meta-analysis suggested that the diagnostic accuracy of circulating cfDNA has unsatisfactory sensitivity but acceptable specificity for diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the integrity index (ALU247/ALU115) is better than absolute DNA concentration in diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.