Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29849845›Full record

Trial reportPain research & management2018

Intranasal Pharmacokinetics of Morphine ARER, a Novel Abuse-Deterrent Formulation: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Four-Way Crossover Study in Nondependent, Opioid-Experienced Subjects.

Lynn R Webster, Carmela Pantaleon, Matthew Iverson, Michael D Smith, Eric R Kinzler, Stefan Aigner

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain research & management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynn R WebsterPRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8609-9424
Carmela PantaleonInspirion Delivery Sciences LLC, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Matthew IversonInspirion Delivery Sciences LLC, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Michael D SmithPRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Eric R KinzlerInspirion Delivery Sciences LLC, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Stefan AignerInspirion Delivery Sciences LLC, Morristown, NJ, USA.
PRA Health Sciences · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Morphine ARER, an extended-release (ER), abuse-deterrent formulation of morphine sulfate after oral and intranasal administration. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study assessed the PK of morphine and its active metabolite, M6G, from crushed intranasal Morphine ARER and intact oral Morphine ARER compared with crushed intranasal ER morphine following administration to nondependent, recreational opioid users. The correlation between morphine PK and the pharmacodynamic parameter of drug liking, a measure of abuse potential, was also evaluated. Results: Mean maximum observed plasma concentration ( Conclusion: These data suggest that Morphine ARER maintains its ER profile despite physical manipulation and intranasal administration, which may be predictive of a lower intranasal abuse potential compared with ER morphine.

Indexed as

Abuse-Deterrent FormulationsAdministration, IntranasalAdultAnalgesics, OpioidArea Under CurveCross-Over StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMorphineOpioid-Related DisordersTime FactorsYoung AdultAbuse-Deterrent FormulationsAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsMorphine

Identifiers

PMID29849845
PMCPMC5937443
OpenAlexW2800089380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.