Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29849841›Full record

Observational studyPain research & management2018

Patient and Physician Satisfaction with Analgesic Treatment: Findings from the Analgesic Treatment for Cancer Pain in Southeast Asia (ACE) Study.

Dang Huy Quoc Thinh, Wimonrat Sriraj, Marzida Mansor, Kian Hian Tan, Cosphiadi Irawan, Johan Kurnianda, Yen Phi Nguyen, Annielyn Ong-Cornel, Yacine Hadjiat, Hanlim Moon and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pain research & management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664987 (A Cross-sectional Study to Investigate the Pain Control Status in Cancer Patients in South East Asian Countries), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664987 completednot on this map

A Cross-sectional Study to Investigate the Pain Control Status in Cancer Patients in South East Asian Countries

TypeobservationalSponsorMundipharma Pte Ltd.Ran2015 to 2015Enrolled462ConditionsPainArmsPatients receiving cancer pain treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Dang Huy Quoc ThinhDepartment of Radiation Oncology, HCMC Oncology Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Wimonrat SrirajDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Marzida MansorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Kian Hian TanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Cosphiadi IrawanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital (RSCM), University of Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia.
Johan KurniandaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Yen Phi NguyenDepartment of Palliative Care and Pain Management, K Hospital, Vietnam National Cancer Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Annielyn Ong-CornelVeterans Memorial Medical Centre, Quezon City, Philippines.
Yacine HadjiatAPAC LATAM MEA, Mundipharma, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2524-6854
Hanlim MoonAPAC LATAM MEA, Mundipharma, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2415-8753
Francis O JavierPain Management Center, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-3913
Mundipharma (Netherlands) · NLKhon Kaen University · THSingapore General Hospital · SGSt. Luke's Medical Center · PHUniversitas Gadjah Mada · IDUniversity of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Malaya · MYVietnam National Children's Hospital · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine patients' and physicians' satisfaction, and concordance of patient-physician satisfaction with patients' pain control status. Methods: This cross-sectional observational study involved 465 adults prescribed analgesics for cancer-related pain from 22 sites across Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam. Pain intensity, pain control satisfaction, and adequacy of analgesics for pain control were documented using questionnaires. Results: Most patients (84.4%) had stage III or IV cancer. On a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worse pain), patients' mean worst pain intensity over 24 hours was 4.76 (SD 2.47). More physicians (19.0%) than patients (8.0%) reported dissatisfaction with patient's pain control. Concordance of patient-physician satisfaction was low (weighted kappa 0.36; 95% CI 0.03-0.24). Most physicians (71.2%) found analgesics to be adequate for pain control. Patients' and physicians' satisfaction with pain control and physician-assessed analgesic adequacy were significantly different across countries ( Conclusions: Despite pain-related problems with sleep and quality of life, patients were generally satisfied with their pain control status. Interestingly, physicians were more likely to be dissatisfied with patients' pain control. Enhanced patient-physician communication, physicians' proactivity in managing opioid-induced adverse effects, and accessibility of analgesics have been identified to be crucial for successful cancer pain management. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT02664987).

Indexed as

Cancer PainPersonal SatisfactionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionAnalgesicsAsia, SoutheasternCross-Sectional StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansInternational CooperationMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics

Identifiers

PMID29849841
PMCPMC5932441
OpenAlexW2801357957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.