ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2018
Positive
Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of Opportunistic Fungi from the Bronchoalveolar Lavage Specimens of Patients with Pulmonary Diseases.Advanced biomedical research · 2023Article
- Is It Possible to DifferentiateJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- COVID-19 andMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Multiplex Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction on Sputum for the Diagnosis ofInfection and drug resistance · 2021Article
- Diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A review of current methods and novel approaches.Medical mycology · 2020Review
- Article
- Utility of Bronchoscopy with Bronchoalveolar Lavage among Hematologic Transplant Recipients in the Era of Noninvasive Testing.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The diagnostic standard for Methods: We identified all patients who underwent Results: From 2011 to 2016, 4431 respiratory samples from 3021 unique patients were tested for the presence of Conclusion: Our results suggest that discordant
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.