ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2018
Treatment of Urolithiasis with Medicinal Plant
Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a full-process intelligent information management system on the prevention of postoperative infection in patients with indwelling double-J stents after surgery for urinary tract stones: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- History of Renal Stone Surgery: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Therapeutic effects of Chinese herbal medicines for treatment of urolithiasis: A review.Chinese herbal medicines · 2023Review
- Article
- Application of Omaha system-based continuing care in patients with retained double J tube after urinary calculus surgery.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Animal Models for Studying Stone Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Article
- Nephroprotective effects of ethanolic root extract ofIndian journal of pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.